District Court Cases in Montana

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,594
Cranska v. UMIA Insurance, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv00104
Plaintiff: Stephen Cranska
Defendant: UMIA Insurance, Inc., American Casualty Company of Reading Pennsylvania, Preferred Physicians Medical Risk Retention Group and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Duffy et al v. Kaman Aerospace Corporation
as 2:2021cv00071
Plaintiff: Mark Duffy, Central Copters, Inc.
Defendant: Kaman Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Cowger v. Signal Peak Energy
as 1:2021cv00099
Plaintiff: Justin Cowger
Defendant: Signal Peak Energy
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Bird v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2021cv00103
Petitioner: Clifford Bird, Sr.
Respondent: Jim Salmonsen, Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLAINTIFF v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv90001
Plaintiff: TEST PLAINTIFF
Defendant: Defendant
Cause Of Action: Labor Litigation
Akerstrom v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00098
Plaintiff: Margaret A. Akerstrom
Defendant: Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lout v. State of Montana
as 9:2021cv00102
Petitioner: Jeffery John Lout
Respondent: State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trimp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00069
Plaintiff: Ronald M. Trimp
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hammonds v. Medical Rep. Chase et al
as 1:2021cv00097
Plaintiff: Robert Paul Hammonds
Defendant: Medical Rep. Chase, Medical Rep. Lovato, Sgt. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reilly v. AmTrust North America, Inc., et al
as 9:2021cv00101
Plaintiff: Richard Reilly
Defendant: AmTrust North America, Inc.,, Laura Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?