Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20,780
Abrams (PS) v. Division of Unemployment Insurance
as 1:2024cv03390
Defendant:
Division of Unemployment Insurance
Plaintiff:
Joshua Abrams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (d)(p) - Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Langworthy v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Colfax County and Si Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hayes v. Watson
as 1:2024cv01231
Defendant:
Ethan Watson
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McCowan (PS) v. McCowan Foley et al
as 1:2024cv03379
Defendant:
Horace McCowan, III, Lisa Grace McCowan Foley, Maxine McCowan and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah McCowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
London v. Muscogee Creek Nation Lighthorse Police et al
as 4:2024cv00592
Defendant:
Glenpool Wrecker Driver and Muscogee Creek Nation Lighthorse Police
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
London V. OGE Electric Company
as 4:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Defendant:
OGE Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
London v. Metro PCS / T Mobile
as 4:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Defendant:
Metro PCS / T Mobile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Underwood v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board et al
as 5:2024cv01266
Defendant:
Richard Miller, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Tom Bates
Plaintiff:
Kevin Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarvis v. Teton County et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Teton County Sheriff's Department Deputy Jenkins, Seth Lewis, Justin Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan-Michael Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
