U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,646
Gabaldon v. New Mexico State Police, et al
as 24-2104
Plaintiff:
CRAIG GABALDON
Defendant:
NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE, KEVIN SMITH, in his individual capacity and KURTIS WARD, in his individual capacity
Adams v. Orr, et al
as 24-8046
Defendant:
TERRA, in their official capacity as M & F Towing Owner, BRAD DOBESH, individually and in their official capacity as Avis Budget Car Rental Escalation Team Member, CARESA MARINO, individually and in her official capacity as Cheyenne Police Department Peace Officer and others
Plaintiff:
LATOYA L. ADAMS
Villecco v. Barela, et al
as 24-1297
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. BARELA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment and PHILIP E. SPESSHARDT, in his official capacity as Director of the Division of Unemployment Insurance, Colorado Department of Labor and Employment
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL VILLECCO
Hackford v. United States
as 24-4078
Plaintiff:
RICHITA MARIE HACKFORD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Burke v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 24-6149
Defendant:
JASON SAMUEL, an individual, CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a municipal corporation and JOSHUA NORTON, an individual
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. BURKE
Phillips v. Rose, et al
as 24-2101
Defendant:
LORENZO EMILIO, TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and TIMOTHY ROSE
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEE PHILLIPS
DiCesare v. Cherokee Nation, et al
as 24-5085
Defendant:
DAVID BECK, DAVID POINDEXTER, THE CHEROKEE NATION and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANGELO DICESARE
Cooks v. Oklahoma City Police Department, et al
as 24-6145
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OCPD LT. LINDSEY, OCPD OFFICER TYLER ARNEY and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD EUGENE COOKS
Richter v. Nelson, et al
as 24-5084
Defendant:
ANISSA BEDARD, SHELIA LOWERY, ROBIN HATFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN D. RICHTER, Administrator of the Estate of Xander Cage Harris-Bruntmyer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
