Oklahoma Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,832
London v. Muscogee Creek Nation Lighthorse Police et al
as 4:2024cv00592
Defendant:
Glenpool Wrecker Driver and Muscogee Creek Nation Lighthorse Police
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
London V. OGE Electric Company
as 4:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Defendant:
OGE Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
London v. Metro PCS / T Mobile
as 4:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Defendant:
Metro PCS / T Mobile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Underwood v. Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board et al
as 5:2024cv01266
Defendant:
Richard Miller, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Tom Bates
Plaintiff:
Kevin Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braswell v. Hulbert, Town of et al
as 6:2024cv00471
Defendant:
Colton Coble and Hulbert, Town of
Plaintiff:
Derek Braswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SS Utility Group LLC v. SS Group USA LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Scott Pickney and SS Group USA LLC
Plaintiff:
SS Utility Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
London v. Garrison et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kevin London
Defendant:
Justin L Burch, Hunter M Garrison and Charles Dale Bybee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agbonze v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Nosakhare Agbonze
Defendant:
Osage County Jail, State of Oklahoma, Osage County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flowers v. Doe
as 6:2024cv00469
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv01241
Defendant:
David Wayne Loman, Board of County Commissioners, Roy Chris West and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
