North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,739
Mungro v. City of Claremont et al
as 5:2024cv00249
Defendant:
Special Agent R.G. Crawley, City of Claremont, Claremont Police Officer Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Aaliyah Mungro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDS v. CITY OF DURHAM
as 1:2024cv00955
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM
Plaintiff:
CORNELL RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. JOHNSON
as 1:2024cv00957
Defendant:
TERRY S. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Canipe v. Rankin et al
as 3:2024cv01000
Defendant:
Roxanne Rankin and Morris Keeter
Plaintiff:
Roger Canipe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Defendant:
JUDGE DORETTA L. WALKER and CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD
Plaintiff:
CIVIL RIGHTS CORPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Bowling et al
as 7:2024cv01077
Defendant:
Brian Chism, Blake Young, Keith Bowling and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lyndell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DUNCAN v. COUNTY OF SURRY et al
as 1:2024cv00938
Defendant:
DEPUTY JOHN DOE, I, SHERIFF STEVE C. HIATT, DEPUTY WHITAKER and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN T. DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00636
Defendant:
Estella Patterson, L K Ferguson and City of Raleigh
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Batten v. Well Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Karen Batten
Defendant:
Well Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALLEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 5:2024cv00631
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Roy Cooper
Petitioner:
Derrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
