Indiana Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,164
TYO et al v. BIGGS
as 3:2021cv00821
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS TYO, STEVEN STANLEY and DREW LANDES
Defendant: ETHAN BIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Tague
as 1:2021cv00402
Plaintiff: Marlin D Adams
Defendant: L Tague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANLEY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Plaintiff: KRISTI CHANLEY
Defendant: CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA, MARIO REID, CODY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temores v. City of Hammond et al
as 2:2021cv00327
Plaintiff: Antonio Temores
Defendant: City of Hammond, Chief of Police William Short, Officer D A Hornyak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADY v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2021cv02684
Plaintiff: BRANDON BRADY
Defendant: TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowes-Northern v. Choices Hotel International et al
as 2:2021cv00331
Plaintiff: Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant: Choices Hotel International, Illinois Department of Children Services, Michael Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbert et al v. Hoosier Inn Extended Stay Hotel et al
as 1:2021cv00392
Plaintiff: Robert Hubbert and Andrea Love
Defendant: Hoosier Inn Extended Stay Hotel and Gas-Way LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Bohdan et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Plaintiff: Marlin D Adams
Defendant: John Bohdan, Jason C Custer and Nathan McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. POWDEN et al
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff: CALVIN JACKSON and LATISHA BRADLEY
Defendant: BRANDT POWDEN and CITY OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAGEMIER v. CITY OF MADISON et al
as 4:2021cv00164
Plaintiff: TAMI HAGEMIER
Defendant: IN CITY OF MADISON, PATRICK THEVENOW, AMANDA CREECH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?