District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Na v. Mullin et al
as 3:2026cv00716
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
REYNOLDS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC.
as 1:2026cv01398
Plaintiff:
Tonisha Reynolds
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BROCK, III v. TOWN OF WEST TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA et al
as 2:2026cv00459
Plaintiff:
GLENN BROCK, III
Defendant:
TOWN OF WEST TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, DAVE ELKINS, JODY ROACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00979
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. MAC'S CONVENIENCE STORE, LLC, D/B/A CIRCLE K
as 4:2026cv00170
Plaintiff:
ENDIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
MAC'S CONVENIENCE STORE, LLC, D/B/A CIRCLE K
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOWKER v. CHILTON
as 3:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. BOWKER, JR.
Defendant:
CHILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISLE v. SUMMIT CAPITAL PARTNERS AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, LP d/b/a RNR Tire Express
as 2:2026cv00458
Plaintiff:
TRENT E. ISLE
Defendant:
SUMMIT CAPITAL PARTNERS AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, LP d/b/a RNR Tire Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell v. Schroder et al
as 4:2026cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kenisha Mitchell
Defendant:
Garrett Schroder, Thomas W. McKee, Anthony M. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
