Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Robertson v. Fletcher et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Defendant:
Justin Sexton, Laquiah Amburgey, Jaclin Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Derrell Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. WADDAS
as 2:2024cv00428
Petitioner:
SHANE LOUIS PETERSON
Respondent:
J. WADDAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MOORE v. HOUSE et al
as 1:2024cv01482
Defendant:
VELEZ, KMERTS, YANCY and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv01481
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TISHNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JENNINGS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01483
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, STATE OF INDIANA and U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
JOSEF JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Defendant:
A. MOSELEY, D. BEDWELL, JAMES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00426
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, MATTHEW LEOHR, JACQUELYNNE PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
DION JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEPLINGER v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
CURTIS D. KEPLINGER
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, PABLO PEREZ and MIRANDA WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Brandon Newell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
