District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 15,485
Lohnes v. Buncich et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Petitioner: James Andrew Lohnes
Respondent: John Buncich, Mr Davies
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McClain v. Donahue et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff: Joe Howard McClain
Defendant: Matias, Lawson, S. Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fritz v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00134
Petitioner: Mark Mathew Fritz
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00508
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: MIGUEL ROBERSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00509
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: MIGUEL ROBERSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAMBREL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00503
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CROW, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: NORMAN GAMBREL
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PITCHFORD v. BUNCH et al
as 2:2017cv00087
Defendant: DEPUTY BERRY, CORPORAL BUCHANAN, OFFICER MARK BUNCH and others
Plaintiff: DEJON PITCHFORD
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv00507
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner: MIGUEL ROBERSON
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAINED v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2017cv00083
Plaintiff: EMANUEL DAMOUND BAINED
Defendant: VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAYAC v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00079
Respondent: J.E. KRUEGER
Petitioner: ANDREW ZAYAC
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?