District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,409
EASTER v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv01674
Petitioner: GREGORY EASTER
Miscellaneou: PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCINTYRE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01673
Petitioner: JACOB MCINTYRE
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JENKINS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv00223
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner: ROBERT JENKINS
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUFFIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00225
Petitioner: ANTHONY R. RUFFIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01619
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TRIPP v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00222
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Plaintiff: TERRY TRIPP
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOSSETT v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01595
Petitioner: BRENDA DOSSETT
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01618
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duff v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00383
Petitioner: Antoine D Duff
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01620
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?