Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 11,849
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner: Rickey R Armour
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner: OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent: CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner: DENAR ROYAL
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner: RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent: DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner: DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JORDAN v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00163
Petitioner: DENZEL JORDAN
Respondent: WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jennings v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner: Quinton Jennings
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TISHNER v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv00724
Petitioner: JOSHUA W. TISHNER
Respondent: PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner: RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRASHEAR v. WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
as 1:2024cv00727
Petitioner: EDWARD BRASHEAR
Respondent: WARDEN (N.C.C.F.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?