Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 11,853
PARKS v. KALLIS
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
DARRELL PARKS
Respondent:
S. KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTON v. DANKS
as 3:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
TYLER CAINE BARTON
Respondent:
JONATHAN DANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DURHAM v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
DARRELL DURHAM
Respondent:
EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Grant County Prosecutor Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brown and Lloyd Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Service List
Respondent:
Grant County Prosecutor Agency, Grant County Probation Agency, Marion, Indiana City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
