US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 71,917
RICHARDSON v. PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
HENRY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Northcutt v. AutoZone Stores LLC
as 1:2024cv01265
Defendant:
AutoZone Stores LLC
Plaintiff:
Florence Northcutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LILLARD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MCCARTHY v. BURKETT et al
as 1:2024cv01267
Defendant:
SHANE NELSON, BRIAN VANDERVORT, ISSAC RANDOLPH and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST. CLAIR-BEY v. VANIHAL et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Defendant:
VANIHAL and V. DEAKINS
Plaintiff:
MAYSON ST. CLAIR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
NALAKEIO BENNETT
Defendant:
A. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONG v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
TINA LONG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
