US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 52,436
PAYNE v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv03957
Plaintiff: DENNIS RAY PAYNE, JR.
Defendant: DOUG HUESTUS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, KELLY RHODA
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
MORROW v. CORE CIVIC et al
as 1:2019cv03955
Defendant: SHAW, CORE CIVIC, PROBST and others
Plaintiff: JEFFERY L. MORROW
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEER et al v. NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC et al
as 1:2019cv03964
Plaintiff: LEONARD SPEER, PAULA SPEER
Defendant: NINEBOT INC., SEGWAY INC., NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
MAYFIELD v. BROWN
as 2:2019cv00455
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner: CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WELIEVER v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv03960
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: KAREN WELIEVER
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MACNAUGHTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03965
Plaintiff: LUTORA MACNAUGHTON
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
DEMESMIN v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv00198
Defendant: DAVE WEDDING, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff: FITOLAY DEMESMIN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03967
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HUFFMAN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03966
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: JANET HUFFMAN, JOHN E. HUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
FRANKLIN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00457
Defendant: FISCHER, RICHARD BROWN
Plaintiff: QUATERRIS FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?