US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 71,171
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DICKERSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D. DICKERSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE IRON WORKERS' LOCAL NO. 25 PENSION FUND et al v. METRO ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2024mc00021
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MARTIN et al v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
ALEX MARTIN and ELISABETH MARTIN
Defendant:
AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PARTNERS, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
CARR et al v. TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ALAN CARR and DAVID G. SCHUSTER
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRAME v. MART et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
DEBORA JANE FRAME
Defendant:
RUBEN MART, KYLE GIBBONS, KRISTIE COMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
