MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
| MARK L. MARTIN, II |
| CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX, AMY WHEELER and T. LEWIS |
| 1:2024cv00793 |
| May 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff MARK L. MARTIN, II. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Affidavit of Michael Kelly, #2 Exhibit 2 Declaration of Cody Fyock, #3 Exhibit 3 Declaration of Joshua Browning, #4 Exhibit 4 Report of Classification Hearing, Offender Evaluation And Performance Report, #5 Exhibit 5 Grievance Appeal, #6 Exhibit 6 Request For Interview, #7 Exhibit 7 Grievance Appeal, #8 Exhibit 8 Request For Interview, #9 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARK L. MARTIN, II. (Attachments: #1 transactions, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX, T. LEWIS, AMY WHEELER, filed by MARK L. MARTIN, II. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
