District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCINTOSH, JR v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01905
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCINTOSH, JR
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Torres et al v. Jackson et al
as 2:2026cv00445
Plaintiff:
Andres Torres and Isabella Torres
Defendant:
Katherine Jackson and Katherine Esther Jackson Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WIDGERY v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01908
Plaintiff:
KATRINA H. WIDGERY
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
GEARY v. BISIGNANO
as 3:2026cv00207
Plaintiff:
MELISSA J. GEARY
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Simon v. Huntington County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2026cv00473
Defendant:
Huntington County Sheriff's Department, Huntington Cnty. Sheriff Dept., Debbie Meier and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
