Northern District of Indiana Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 25,435
McClain v. Donahue et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff: Joe Howard McClain
Defendant: Matias, Lawson, S. Sherry and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Lohnes v. Buncich et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Petitioner: James Andrew Lohnes
Respondent: John Buncich, Mr Davies
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Sutton v. Wisconsin Central. Ltd.
as 2:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: Domonic Sutton
Defendant: Wisconsin Central. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Marrafino v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00132
Plaintiff: Cynthia Marrafino
Defendant: Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet, Inc., Biomet Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
State Farm Automobile Insurance Company v. Sanders et al
as 3:2017cv00137
Plaintiff: State Farm Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant: Zachary Sanders, Charles Mapes, as parent and natural guardian of Troy Mapes, Deceased
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Cels et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00136
Plaintiff: Jennifer Cels , Harvey Cels
Defendant: Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Fritz v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00134
Petitioner: Mark Mathew Fritz
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?