US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,019
Finnegan v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00047
Petitioner:
Russell Grant Finnegan and Russell Finnegan
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00033
Petitioner:
Dequarius Desune Walker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boutte' v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00045
Petitioner:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvies v. Warden
as 3:2025cv00018
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
William O Alvies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodwin v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00988
Petitioner:
Deandre Goodwin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greer v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Brian K Greer and Brian Greer
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padgett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00975
Petitioner:
Zane T Padgett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00435
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Roger Ray Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Larkin v. Indiana State of
as 2:2024cv00423
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
John B Larkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jester v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00964
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Ricky Wayne Jester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
