US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,922
Crain v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Durell T Crain
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrold v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Shane A Harrold and Shane Harrold
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tidwell v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Loren Wayne Tidwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Byers v. Sheriff
as 4:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Jason L Byers and Jason Logan Byers
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson, III v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Indiana Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Phillip Owens
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peacher v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01106
Petitioner:
Robert Peacher and R Peacher
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01079
Petitioner:
Santana J Gray
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richards v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01070
Petitioner:
Homer T Richards
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
Juvan Brown and Juvan James Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
