Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,028
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Baggett v. BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2024cv02265
Defendant:
BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Plaintiff:
Sarah Baggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00561
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PHILLIPS et al v. LUCAS et al
as 1:2024cv02261
Defendant:
RACHEL LUCAS, NICHOLE GARROD, ADEDAYO OLAOSEBIKAN and others
Plaintiff:
GRANT PHILLIPS and MYRANDA PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARKER et al v. POSEY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv02263
Defendant:
TOM LATHAM, INDIANA POSEY COUNTY, POSEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
