Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 19,029
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Turner v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Darrell Turner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gant et al v. Price et al
as 2:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GANT and LILLIAN GANT
Defendant:
ISIAH PRICE, HESHEEM RAHMAN, DWAYNE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MILNER v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 2:2024cv00585
Defendant:
SHEILA RICE, KYLIE JOHNSON, MIKE PERSON and others
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY MILNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PADGETT v. OWEN CIRCUIT COURT II et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Defendant:
TITLE IV-D AGENCY, OWEN CIRCUIT COURT II and INDIANA CHILD SUPPORT BUREAU
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. PADGETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SMITH v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and UNITED CARING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
