US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,082
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Shurn v. Byers
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Charlie Shurn
Defendant:
Jeff Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Martin v. Department of Child Services et al
as 1:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Martin
Defendant:
Department of Child Services, Erica Bashara and Jasmine Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Martin v. YES Automotive et al
as 1:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Martin
Defendant:
YES Automotive and Brian Brothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gibson et al v. Family Service Division et al
as 4:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Mellissa Gibson and Antonio Gibson
Defendant:
Family Service Division, Michelle Seymore, Lorie Tisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
