US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,358
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. South Bend Community School Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant:
South Bend Community School Corporation and Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bates v. Morris et al
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daris Bates
Defendant:
Jalen Morris and Kayvionne Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 117 Americans with Disabilites Act
Gregory v White County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Isaac William Gregory
Defendant:
White County Superior Court, Brad Wooley, Laura Cosgray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Warfield v. Rankin
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ieasha R Warfield
Defendant:
Shawn L Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
