US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 7,347
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Fiscel-Shively v. Logansport State Hospital
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Fiscel-Shively
Defendant:
Logansport State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Loraine v. Steuben County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Edward Loraine
Defendant:
Steuben County Sheriff, Braxton Amos, Shane Matchette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Marion Superior Court et al
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonnne Brown
Defendant:
Marion Superior Court and Indiana Department of Child Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forte v. Rutkowski et al
as 3:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Jennipher Renee Forte
Defendant:
Erik Rutkowski, Jason Cuchowicz, Barbara Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hovermale v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hovermale
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Benavidez v. Lippert Components, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BENAVIDEZ
Defendant:
LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
