Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,771
GRAYS v. KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE GRAYS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FEINBERG v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
HANNA FEINBERG
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pena v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Pena
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hatfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Paige Anne Nicole Hatfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
NICE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. NICE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Theurer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Renee Theurer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Dolores R. Alexander
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kelaita v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Daniel S Kelaita
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PLOUGHE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
PAULA L. PLOUGHE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
