US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,509
Groves v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00051
Plaintiff:
Kortney Groves
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Loudenber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00030
Plaintiff:
Candy J Loudenber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Goode v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00022
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Turk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv00023
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
James v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00010
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Valencia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Poor v. Social Security
as 3:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
Victoria L. Poor
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kizzy T. Williams
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Turnpaugh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv00002
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER D. TURNPAUGH
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Lewellen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2025cv00001
Plaintiff:
Helen Eileen Lewellen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00456
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
