Indiana Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,218
BURTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff: HEATHER G. BURTON
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LUMAYE v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff: KAYLEE L. LUMAYE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Charles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00370
Plaintiff: Angel Charles
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FORSYTHE v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00549
Plaintiff: SHERRELL M. FORSYTHE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GRANDPRE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02312
Plaintiff: TAMARA J. GRANDPRE
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LANTRIP v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff: BRIAN GENE LANTRIP
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RUFF v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2022cv00187
Plaintiff: RYAN D. RUFF
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ADDIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02276
Plaintiff: GREGORY A. ADDIS
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00968
Plaintiff: Fred L. Bell
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hamlin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00969
Plaintiff: Katherine S. Hamlin
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?