Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,545
Beldotti v. Carter et al
as 3:2025cv00950
Plaintiff:
Joanne Beldotti
Defendant:
Diane Carter, Pamela Heller, Cherron Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berrio v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2025cv00956
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Berrio
Defendant:
Yanile Hernandez, Jonathan P. Budlong, Kathleen E. Scelfo and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reynolds-El v. Strackbein et al
as 3:2025cv00951
Plaintiff:
Marcus Troy Reynolds-El
Defendant:
Hillary M. Strackbein, Carlos Cruz, Di Colella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Clerk of Derby Superior Court
as 3:2025cv00931
Plaintiff:
Clayton Wilson
Defendant:
Clerk of Derby Superior Court
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wilson v. Diamadi
as 3:2025cv00932
Plaintiff:
Clayton Wilson
Defendant:
Stephanie Diamadi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gould v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2025cv00934
Plaintiff:
George Gould
Defendant:
Brian Sullivan, Keith Wortz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy-Taylor v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2025cv00935
Plaintiff:
Mary Murphy-Taylor
Defendant:
City of New Haven, Brian Sullivan, Keith Wortz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2025cv00943
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Ferguson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division, Rui Rainho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chien v. Nagala et al
as 3:2025cv00944
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Sarala V. Nagala and Kari A. Dooley
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Chien v. Freer et al
as 3:2025cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Defendant:
Richard J. Freer and Timothy P. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
