Fifth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 28,264
Olivo v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff: Melissa Ann Olivo
Defendant: Susan B Reed, Monica Comitsky, Karmen Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balderas v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2024cv00388
Plaintiff: Juan Jose Balderas, Jr.
Defendant: David Gonzales and Carlos Omar Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Kendall et al
as 5:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: Arturo S. Lopez, Sr.
Defendant: Frank Kendall, III, Daniel Peterson, Anthony Scharf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kennedy v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff: David M Kennedy, Jr
Defendant: Douglas Wheeler, Stephen Dean, Gary Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borne v. Home Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: Jason Borne
Defendant: Home Bank, N.A., Stephen Damore, Newman, Mathis, Brady & Spedale, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flanagan v. Walmart Corporation et al
as 9:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Theodore Flanagan
Defendant: Walmart Corporation and Connie K. Wu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cantu et al v. Brennand et al
as 5:2024cv00382
Plaintiff: Erik Cantu, Jr. and Emily Proulx
Defendant: James Brennand and City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darries v. Cornelius
as 24-20159
Plaintiff: Willie Darries
Defendant: R. P. Cornelius
Demas v. City of McAllen Police
as 24-40238
Plaintiff: Evenson Demas
Defendant: City of McAllen Police Department, Peter Boyko, individually and as agent of City of McAllen Police Department and Comfort Awuku, individually and other officers unknown
Carico v. Bristow
as 24-40239
Plaintiff: Colton Carico
Defendant: Derek Bristow

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?