Liptak v. United States et al
Plaintiff: V F Liptak
Defendant: United States and Commissioner of IRS
Case Number: 3:2025cv00769
Filed: March 28, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David C Godbey
Referring Judge: David L Horan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2025 Filing 6 JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 5/12/2025) (twd)
May 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ACCEPTING #4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 5/12/2025) (twd)
May 12, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Mon May 12 14:58:06 CDT 2025 (crt)
April 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court should dismiss the complaint with prejudice. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 4/8/2025) (twd)
April 8, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Apr 8 12:28:55 CDT 2025 (crt)
March 28, 2025 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND and Emergency Transfer/Relief Requested against Commissioner of IRS, United States filed by V F Liptak. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number 300017002) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (knb)
March 28, 2025 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (knb)
March 28, 2025 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (knb)
March 28, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Fri Mar 28 15:05:32 CDT 2025 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liptak v. United States et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: V F Liptak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of IRS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?