District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 461,110
Smoak v. BioHealth RX LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00919
Plaintiff:
Ellen Smoak
Defendant:
BioHealth RX LLC, Edward Coke Mann IV and Edward Coke Mann III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Myers v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 3:2025cv00920
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Myers
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Schaefer v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2025cv00405
Plaintiff:
Lauren Schaefer
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Bell Texron
as 3:2025cv00921
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Bell Texron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2025cv00057
Petitioner:
Tracy Sabrina Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2025cv00922
Petitioner:
Andre James Wiley and Christopher Lee Wiley
Respondent:
State of Texas, Hector Garza, Taylor Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
