District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 453,196
Hicks v. Smith County et al
as 6:2024cv00444
Defendant:
TDCJ, President, The, Smith County and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Hicks and Dude Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prb
Good Luck Exxon, Inc. v. Brad Hall & Associates, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Good Luck Exxon, Inc.
Defendant:
Brad Hall & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dixon v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
as 3:2024cv03028
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Plaintiff:
James D Dixon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Daniels v. Regions Bank
as 4:2024cv01193
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Plaintiff:
Randle C. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
Moran v. SEP Casa, LLC
as 3:2024cv03030
Defendant:
SEP Casa, LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Moran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dominguez v. Monada LLC et al
as 4:2024cv01192
Defendant:
Nazar Chaplinskyy and Monada LLC
Plaintiff:
Clara Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Apple v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. d/b/a Home Depot et al
as 3:2024cv03039
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc and Robert Heard
Plaintiff:
Janice Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lopez v. Air Liquide USA, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03042
Defendant:
Air Liquide USA LLC and Airgas USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Kim Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sivley & Toogood, DDS v United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2024cv00204
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Sivley & Toogood, DDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
