Fifth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 53,000
Bathelemy v. Riverbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02854
Defendant:
Riverbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexis Bathelemy
Cause Of Action: Sex Discrimination
Keller v. Riverbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02858
Plaintiff:
Leslie Keller
Defendant:
Riverbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Sex Discrimination
Broussard v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government et al
as 6:2020cv01356
Plaintiff:
Blake A Broussard
Defendant:
Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, Scott Morgan, Ricky Fontenot
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Heap et al
as 4:2020cv03572
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY, JOHN DOE 1 to 5, Constable Ted Heap
Plaintiff:
Constable Herschel Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Valdez v. Thompson et al
as 4:2020cv01146
Defendant:
Venus Wehle, City of Forest Hill, Tommie Thompson
Plaintiff:
Sean Valdez
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
Schapira et al v. Bexar County, Texas et al
as 5:2020cv01241
Defendant:
Kayla Flores, Javier Salazar, Bexar County, Texas
Plaintiff:
Patricia Benitez, Chris Schapira
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
