Fifth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Voting Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 387
Smith v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00147
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
OCA-Greater Houston, et al v. State of Texas, et al
as 16-51126
Plaintiff - Appellee: OCA-GREATER HOUSTON, MALLIKA DAS
Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF TEXAS, CARLOS CASCOS, In his official capacity as Texas Secretary of State and Chief Election Officer
Williams v. Ingram et al
as 3:2016cv02516
Plaintiff: Eric Williams
Defendant: Keith Ingram, Coby Shorter, III
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
USA v. State of Louisiana
as 16-30908
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: J. THOMAS SCHEDLER, Louisiana Secretary of State
Lopez et al v. Abbott et al
as 2:2016cv00303
Plaintiff: Lionel Lopez , Isabela Araiza , Arlene Lira Easter and others
Defendant: Greg Abbott , Carlos Cascos
Cause Of Action: Voting Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Ned v. Eunice et al
as 6:2016cv01034
Plaintiff: Lionel Ned
Defendant: Chief of Police City of Eunice, City Police Dept Eunice, Randy Fontenot and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Faas v. Cascos et al
as 4:2016cv01299
Plaintiff: Souraya Faas
Defendant: Carlos Cascos , State of Texas
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Type: Civil Rights Voting
VAYLA New Orleans et al v. Schedler et al
as 3:2016cv00305
Plaintiff: Norma Flores, Thanh Mai, Floridalma Mansilla and others
Defendant: Angie Rogers, Tom Schedler
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Phillip West, et al v. Natchez, Mississippi
as 16-60241
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILLIP C. WEST, REVEREND CLIFTON E. MARVEZ, SR., JACQUELINE MARSHALL and others
Defendant - Appellee: NATCHEZ, MISSISSIPPI
Goberman v. Cascos We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00994
Plaintiff: Pavel Goberman
Defendant: Carlos Cascos
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?