Mississippi Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,620
Holliday v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephen Holliday
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi and Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Surf Moore
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Bailey, K-9 Officer Tony Shack, Investigator Christian Dedmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leggett v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cooper Leggett
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wayne County Board of Supervisors, Hal Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martin v. City of Poplarville, MS
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Bert Martin
Defendant:
City of Poplarville, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lacey v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lacey
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fischer v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fischer
Defendant:
Trooper Jason Young and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aiken v. Bell et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Aaron Aiken
Defendant:
Trooper Cameron Bell and Mississippi Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Necaise v. Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Amy Necaise
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harleen Blair
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, Mike Farmer, Philip L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
