Nebraska Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,600
Darwin v. Zoss
as 8:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Barnabas H. Darwin
Defendant:
Julia C. Zoss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chatman v. Omaha Housing Authority
as 8:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Paulette Chatman
Defendant:
Omaha Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Soto-Elliott v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2024cv00290
Defendant:
McDaniel, Aimee C. Bataillon, Honda Cars of Bellevue Dealership and others
Plaintiff:
Yukie Soto-Elliott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
as 8:2024cv00288
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angelica M Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Buttercase v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Maria Buttercase
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. University of Nebraska et al
as 8:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Holloway
Defendant:
City Operator of Vehicle, City Parking Clerk and University of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Burlington Northern RailRoad et al
as 8:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Rex Norman Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
Burlington Northern RailRoad and Cass County Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kuehner v. Marion et al
as 8:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Kuehner
Defendant:
Shaina N. Marion and Mitchell J. Krutina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hood-Bey v. Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 8:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hood-Bey
Defendant:
Department of Motor Vehicles, Douglas County Court, State of Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. Placzek
as 8:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Walter Holloway
Defendant:
Matthew Placzek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
