District of Alaska Court Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,843
McInally v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Kathleen McInally
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Acosta v. State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
as 1:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Luzader v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Laurie Diane Luzader
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Epperly et al v. Potter et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Gordon Warren Epperly, Esther Katherine Epperly
Defendant:
Robin Potter, Bud C. Cribley
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. USAA Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Nicole Chapman
Defendant:
USAA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
Whittaker v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Susan Christine Whittaker
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stoltenberg v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Edwin Allen Stoltenberg
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Dean Williams, Shannon McCloud
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Urban Anesthesiology, P.C. v. Grohe America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Urban Anesthesiology, P.C.
Defendant:
Grohe America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Grohe America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Defendant:
Grohe America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Richardson v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Sarah Richardson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
