Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,701
Burno v. United States
as 3:2026cv00315
Petitioner:
Peter Michael Burno
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States of America v. Ritchie
as 3:2026cv00312
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Donald Lawrence Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Flowerdew
as 3:2026cv00313
Petitioner:
Willie Keith Jackson
Respondent:
Randy Flowerdew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Artola v. Wooliver
as 3:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
Mario Artola
Defendant:
Jesslin Wooliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burno v. Mercer
as 3:2026cv00311
Petitioner:
Peter Michael Burno
Defendant:
J. Mercer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McLaughlin v. Zener et al
as 3:2026cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael L. McLaughlin
Defendant:
Michael Zener, Carol L. Einerson, Jacqueline Villacorta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abobon v. Gentry et al
as 3:2026cv00305
Plaintiff:
Zx Dio Abobon
Defendant:
Gentry, Waters and Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shetters v. Pikey et al
as 3:2026cv00301
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Shetters
Defendant:
Erik Pikey, Peters and Mrs. Tito
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coopchiak v. Atkinson
as 3:2026cv00299
Petitioner:
Tristen Charles Coopchiak
Defendant:
Travis Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tegoseak v. Anchorage Police Department et al
as 3:2026cv00303
Plaintiff:
Rockwell Dee Tegoseak
Defendant:
Anchorage Police Department, Sean Case and Catherine M. Easter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
