Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,370
Martin v. State of Alaska
as 4:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Danny W. Martin
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Keller v. Aki et al
as 3:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keller, T.J. Kellar, Tom Kellar and others
Defendant:
Keith Aki, Sidney Wood, Jason Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
William Gary
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections, Jen Winkleman, Arnaldo Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schneider v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Lucas Canton Schneider
Respondent:
Treg Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Tom'e et al
as 3:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Carol B. Tom'e, Helena Keeney, Robert Bressler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vail v. Elmore et al
as 3:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rory Evan Vail
Defendant:
Elmore, Strauther and Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattila v. City of Palmer et al
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Lonny P. Mattila
Defendant:
City of Palmer, Michael Lynch, Sawyer Skiba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mestrin et al
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
David P Rogers
Defendant:
Mike Mestrin, Ricky Ronald, Greg McDonald and others
Lee v. State of Alaska
as 1:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Frank W. Lee
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
