District Court Cases in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 77,517
Hohorst v. Costco Wholesale
as 2:2020cv01773
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale
Plaintiff:
Robin Hohorst
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. United States Attorney General
as 4:2020cv00391
Petitioner:
David Smith
Respondent:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Rexnord Industries LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00389
Defendant:
Rexnord Industries LLC, Unknown Parties, Zurn Industries Incorporated
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Nyroth v. Airobotics Incorporated
as 2:2020cv01772
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Nyroth
Defendant:
Airobotics Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Denial of Overtime Compensation
Travis et al v. Assured Imaging LLC
as 4:2020cv00390
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Pineda, Kerri G Peters, Angela T Travis
Defendant:
Assured Imaging LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Crandall v. 99 Cents Only Stores of California Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv01764
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores of California Incorporated, 99 Cents Only Stores LLC, Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
Louann Crandall
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2020cv08236
Petitioner:
Gumercindo Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tripati v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01771
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Ducey et al
as 4:2020cv00388
Respondent:
Doug Ducey, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Darquine Wilson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
