District of Arizona Court Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 59,391
Brandenburg v. Lincoln National Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv02452
Plaintiff:
John Brandenburg
Defendant:
Lincoln National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ogas #120682 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02457
Plaintiff:
Max Ogas
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Carraker v. Wells Fargo et al
as 2:2017cv02460
Plaintiff:
Tinee Carraker
Defendant:
Wells Fargo , Bank of America
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Palaistis v. Meyer et al
as 2:2017cv02453
Plaintiff:
Sevaste Palaistis
Defendant:
Nicholas Meyer , Nancy Meyer , Millennium Dental Associates PC
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Hall v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02454
Plaintiff:
Susan D Hall
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Bray v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02455
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Bray
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv02456
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris #113830 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02436
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Harris
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02441
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hubbard
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Birdine v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02438
Plaintiff:
Homer Lavern Birdine
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
