District of Arizona Court Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 64,536
Nickolich v. Payne et al
as 2:2018cv01884
Plaintiff:
Dushan Stephan Nickolich, II
Defendant:
Shanda Payne, Maduk Mabil
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01872
Plaintiff:
Anita Reynolds
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01870
Plaintiff:
Glenda Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Murrell v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2018cv01881
Plaintiff:
Antony T Murrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Augustus v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01871
Plaintiff:
Brenda Augustus
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Leese v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01874
Plaintiff:
Joan Leese
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01878
Plaintiff:
Glenda Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv08129
Plaintiff:
Audra E Hopkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Leah v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01880
Plaintiff:
Victoria Leah
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
