Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,563
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M Rios, T Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Holland v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00440
Petitioner:
Ronnie Eugene Holland
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bunnell v. Coconino County Jail
as 3:2023cv08560
Plaintiff:
Charles William Bunnell, II
Defendant:
Coconino County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno #166076 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Jorge Herberto Moreno
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, David Shinn, Unknown Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clevenger v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
JuilieAnne M Clevenger
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez-Barragan v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jovana Alvarez-Barragan
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cueto v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cortes Cueto
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Roxanna Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Valdez v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02015
Petitioner:
Efrain Olague Valdez
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
