US District Court for the District of Arizona
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 73,842
Gonzales v. Penzone et al
as 2:2019cv05004
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, William G Montgomery, P Wright
and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Joseph Gonzales
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bishop et al v. Pacific Indemnity Company
as 2:2019cv04999
Defendant:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bishop, Kristy Bishop
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Dart v. Labrad Diagnostics et al
as 2:2019cv04997
Plaintiff:
Kari Dart
Defendant:
Labrad Diagnostics, Sam Akers, SPSAZ Enterprises LLC
and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Nguyen et al
as 2:2019cv04992
Defendant:
Alvin Nguyen, Thanh D Tran, Alina Yen
and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Communications Act of 1934
Strong #256997 v. Pratt et al
as 2:2019cv04991
Defendant:
Corizon, Richard Pratt, Charles L Ryan
Plaintiff:
Preston A Strong
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2019cv04993
Defendant:
Patricia E Hernandez, Carlos Alcantara Mijangos, Fandango Group LLC
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
