District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 4,496
Key v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00500
Petitioner: Rafael Key
Respondent: Charles Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutridge v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2016cv02521
Petitioner: Jennifer Gutridge
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Galeazzi v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02510
Petitioner: Steve Galeazzi
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leacock v. Ryan et al
as 3:2016cv08168
Petitioner: Donald Kevin Leacock
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Ryan
as 4:2016cv00485
Petitioner: Dewey Lee McBride
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker #270777 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2016cv02404
Petitioner: Chastabear Parker
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dickenson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02390
Petitioner: Joseph Dickenson
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2016cv02349
Petitioner: Christopher Robin Ryan
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mocco v. Ryan et al
as 4:2016cv00474
Petitioner: Stephen Joseph Mocco
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mondragon v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02251
Petitioner: Venancio Mondragon
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?