Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,920
Rohrbaugh v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2020cv00295
Defendant: Barbara Von Blanckensee
Plaintiff: Randy L Rohrbaugh
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McLean v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00293
Respondent: David Shinn, Mark Brnovich
Petitioner: Dequaun McLean
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todorich v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01336
Petitioner: John Frank Todorich
Respondent: David Shinn, Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pavulak v. von Blankensee
as 4:2020cv00290
Respondent: Unknown von Blankensee
Petitioner: Paul E Pavulak
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilke v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2020cv00282
Petitioner: Edwin Wilke
Respondent: Barbara Von Blanckensee
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Clouse et al
as 3:2020cv08161
Respondent: David Clouse, Navajo, County of
Petitioner: Neko Wilson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schaffer v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08157
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Andrew Paul Schaffer
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Jensen et al
as 2:2020cv01295
Petitioner: Rayphe Daniel Nichols
Respondent: Edward Jensen, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lombardi v. Mohave County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv08158
Petitioner: Shawn Lombardi
Respondent: Mohave County Jail, Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sheppard v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01264
Respondent: David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Rodney Sheppard
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?