Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Hinton v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2026cv00660
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Hinton
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Chief Estella D. Patterson, in her official capacity, Rodney Monroe, in his individual capacity and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UC LENDING CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv00795
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UC LENDING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INTERLANDI v. TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE et al
as 1:2026cv00788
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL INTERLANDI
Defendant:
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE, CONNER BROWN, ZAKERIE COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
White v. Wayne County Sheriff
as 5:2026cv00564
Plaintiff:
Brandon White
Defendant:
Wayne County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2026cv00790
Plaintiff:
RYAN SMITH
Defendant:
SUZANNE ADAMS, ARLENE BLUTH, ROWAN WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
