Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 26,960
Brian Yates v. Christopher Terry
as 15-1555
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRIAN KNITE YATES
Defendant - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER BLAIR TERRY
Defendant: JON R. ZUMALT, CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON, NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Coley v. Jackson et al
as 8:2015cv01519
Plaintiff: David Clarence Coley
Defendant: Dwight D. Jackson, Angela D. Alsobrroks, Perry J. Becker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Inkrote v. Wicomico County, Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv01521
Plaintiff: David Inkrote
Defendant: Wicomico County, Maryland, David Shipley, R. Wayne Strausburg and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bismark Torkornoo v. Mary Torkornoo
as 15-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant: BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO
Defendant - Appellee: MARY TORKORNOO, JACQUELINE EMANGA NGOLE, Esquire, NINA HELWIG, Esquire (BIA) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1557
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
JOHNSON v. LEMONDS
as 1:2015cv00410
Plaintiff: PAULA JOHNSON
Defendant: SANDRA LEMONDS
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06584
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1549
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Nathaniel Magwood v. Jennifer Haberstadt
as 15-1552
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHANIEL MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee: JENNIFER HABERSTADT, City of Charleston Police Dept., THOMAS CONSTANZA, Charleston County Sheriff Dept.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01456
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.