District Court Cases in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 79,051
Arundel Engineering Corporation v. Selective Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv03508
Defendant:
Selective Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Arundel Engineering Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv03507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv03510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rix v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03506
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Caroline Reneka Rix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arundel Engineering Corporation v. Selective Insurance Company of America
as 8:2024cv03499
Plaintiff:
Arundel Engineering Corporation
Defendant:
Selective Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Tolliver v. Threlfall et al
as 8:2024cv03500
Defendant:
John R Threlfall, Somarl Oden, Town of Bladensburg and others
Plaintiff:
Akiya Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03497
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv03503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
