Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,880
Mich v. United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv01563
Plaintiff:
Aurel Mich
Defendant:
United States of America, Jessup Correctional Institution, Adjei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Putnamville Correctional Facility
as 1:2025cv01566
Plaintiff:
Leroy Walter Frazier, III
Defendant:
Putnamville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. USA 2255
as 1:2025cv01565
Petitioner:
Maurice Monroe
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01559
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. COII Turay et al
as 1:2025cv01564
Plaintiff:
Craig Oliver
Defendant:
COII Turay and Sgt. Foluso Fekoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. USA - 2255
as 1:2025cv01553
Petitioner:
Jaicerius Bradley
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fisher et al
as 1:2025cv01506
Petitioner:
Michael J. Fisher and USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Singleton v. Wilson et al
as 1:2025cv01512
Plaintiff:
Lanai M Singleton
Defendant:
Warden Tyrell Wilson, Sr. and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. FCI Cumberland et al
as 1:2025cv01515
Plaintiff:
Mathew Byrd
Defendant:
FCI Cumberland, Warden, FCI Cumberland, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
