Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,998
Chapman v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff: Jamal Chapman
Defendant: Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Darden
as 1:2022cv03137
Petitioner: Lamont Banks, Jr.
Respondent: Debora Darden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson, Jr. v. Werner et al
as 1:2022cv03118
Petitioner: Dyron Jackson, Jr.
Respondent: Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Warden of MCTC
as 1:2022cv03135
Petitioner: Thomas Woods
Respondent: Warden of MCTC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03104
Petitioner: Lorenzo Thomas
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03071
Petitioner: Jerry Brown
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanley v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03037
Petitioner: David Hanley
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmonds v. State of Maryland
as 1:2022cv03028
Petitioner: Brad Edmonds
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cuthbert v. Bohrer
as 1:2022cv03018
Plaintiff: Kester Gabriel Cuthbert
Defendant: Warden William Bohrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardrick v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv02952
Petitioner: Robert Wardrick
Respondent: State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?