Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,123
Dixon v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Respondent:
Mr. William Bailey and Mr. Brian Frosh
Petitioner:
Marquis Dionte Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv02139
Petitioner:
Devin Lurrell Jones
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv02126
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Keishon Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delano Carter v. Dean et al
as 1:2024cv02046
Defendant:
Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Monte Delano Carter
Respondent:
Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berrios v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv01755
Petitioner:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Respondent:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ong v. Greene et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Petitioner:
Lye Huat Ong
Respondent:
David Greene and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
James Watson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ong v. Scruggs
as 1:2024cv01662
Petitioner:
Lye H. Ong
Respondent:
Carolyn J. Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Circuit Court for Montgomery County et al
as 1:2024cv01610
Petitioner:
Crisstofer Michael French, Sr
Respondent:
Circuit Court for Montgomery County and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Brockenborough et al
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Monique Brockenborough and United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
