Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,654
Joppy v. Dovey
as 1:2019cv01445
Petitioner: Abdullah Malik Joppy, Richard Lee Joppy
Respondent: Warden Richard D. Dovey
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chadwick v. Graham et al
as 1:2019cv01411
Petitioner: Steve Carl Chadwick
Respondent: Richard Graham, Jr., Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary v. The People of the State of Maryland and Baltimore Cty et al
as 1:2019cv01348
Petitioner: Kevin Wayne Gary
Respondent: The People of the State of Maryland and Baltimore Cty, Jane Doe 1-10, David E. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houck v. Warden et al
as 8:2019cv01325
Respondent: Warden, Office of the Attorney General
Petitioner: Mr. James E. Houck
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Bishop et al
as 8:2019cv01302
Petitioner: Thomas L. Bailey
Defendant: Maryland Attorney General
Respondent: Warden Frank Bishop
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blankumsee v. West
as 8:2019cv01297
Respondent: Warden Warter West
Petitioner: Azaniah Blankumsee
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witherspoon v. Bishop
as 8:2019cv01283
Respondent: Frank B. Bishop
Petitioner: Edward Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. Warden
as 1:2019cv01059
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Charles B. Fleming, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milbourne v. Warden
as 8:2019cv00986
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Percy Milbourne
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopata v. Warden
as 8:2019cv00928
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Timothy Lopata
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?