District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,629
Davis v. Warden
as 8:2019cv00422
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Thomas E. Davis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State Of Maryland
as 1:2019cv00427
Respondent: State Of Maryland
Petitioner: Patrick Williams
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Warden
as 8:2019cv00283
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Jason Henry
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. State of Maryland
as 8:2019cv00253
Respondent: State of Maryland
Petitioner: Gregory Donzell Bailey
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suire v. Foxwell et al
as 1:2019cv00252
Respondent: Maryland Attorney General, Warden Ricky Foxwell
Petitioner: David M. Suire
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diyn v. Dovey et al
as 1:2019cv00228
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Richard Dovey
Petitioner: Khalid Shamsud' Diyn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Maryland Attorney General et al
as 8:2019cv00233
Respondent: Warden Phillip Morgan, Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner: Walter L McCoy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Outlaw v. Dovey et al
as 1:2019cv00189
Petitioner: Levon Outlaw
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of Maryland, Richard Dovey
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00176
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Manuel Bonilla
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Drummond v. Foxwell, Warden
as 1:2019cv00086
Petitioner: Byron Sentral Drummond
Respondent: Mr. Ricky Foxwell, Warden
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?