Dixon v. Bailey et al
Marquis Dionte Dixon |
Mr. William Bailey and Mr. Brian Frosh |
1:2024cv02149 |
July 24, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paula Xinis |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Limited Answer RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by William Bailey, Brian Frosh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record, #2 Exhibit 02/17/2022 Transcript, #3 Exhibit 04/07/2022 Transcript, #4 Exhibit 04/19/2022 Transcript, #5 Exhibit 04/21/2022 Transcript, #6 Exhibit 04/22/2022 Transcript, #7 Exhibit 08/10/2022 Transcript)(Donoho, Philip) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Marquis Dionte Dixon(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Marquis Dionte Dixon (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip Murphy Donoho on behalf of William Bailey, Brian Frosh (Donoho, Philip) |
Filing 3 ORDER directing Respondents to FILE an Answer to the Petition on or before 40 days. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 8/5/2024. (c/m & e/m as directed 8/5/024 ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Marquis Dionte Dixon. (slss, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marquis Dionte Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slss, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.