US District Court for the District of Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 74,303
Uzoigwe v. Verizon Maryland LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02572
Plaintiff:
Onwy C. Uzoigwe
Defendant:
Verizon Maryland LLC, Jeffrey S. Douglas and Communications Workers of America Local 2100
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
SESKER v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 8:2023cv02571
Plaintiff:
CHARISE SESKER
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1154 Immigration: Procedure for Granting Immigration Status
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Smith v. USA 2255
as 1:2023cv02567
Petitioner:
Ryan Smith
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mbaraga v. Mayorkas et al
as 8:2023cv02569
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Bolo Mbaraga
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director UR MENDOZA JADDOU and Center Director LOREN K. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Beard v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv02574
Plaintiff:
Wendell Beard
Defendant:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Officer Taylor
as 1:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel-David Bowers
Defendant:
Officer Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Booze v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Gordon Everette Booze, IV
Defendant:
Tyrell Wilson, BCBTC, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
