US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 126,057
Griswold v. Crounse Corporation
as 2:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Jackson A. Griswold
Defendant:
Crounse Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1916 - Jones Act Seaman
Rice v. Mingo Logan Coal LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00629
Defendant:
Arch Resources, Inc., Mingo Logan Coal LLC and Arch Coal, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanna v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hanna
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Messer v. Williams
as 2:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Messer
Defendant:
Booie Williams
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hanshaw v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Henry Ford Hanshaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
West Virginia Board of Risk and Insurance Management v. Black et al
as 3:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Board of Risk Insurance Management
Defendant:
Justin K. Black and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Lacy v. Taylor et al
as 2:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Albert William Lacy
Defendant:
Mark E. Taylor, Tammie Roberts, Clark D. Adkins and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williamson v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00619
Petitioner:
Andre Dewayne Williamson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
