Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 49,045
v. Brookside Park Condominiums, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Lester Lee
Defendant:
Brookside Park Condominiums, Inc., Metropolis aka MCM, Inc., Rammy Azoulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 360
Emiabata v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv01196
Plaintiff:
Philip Emiabata
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Charles and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD
as 8:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Timothy F. Maloney
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD and STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Freddy Spann
Defendant:
Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
