Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,981
Akerman v. Hamel et al
as 1:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Martin Akerman
Defendant:
Attorney Hamel and Unknown State Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00538
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01276
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sarwar v. ITA International LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00477
Defendant:
ITA International LLC and Rally Point Management LLC
Plaintiff:
Chaudhry Ahtsham Sarwar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Capati v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
LaConya Vaughan Capati
Defendant:
Lavetta Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worsham et al v. Abbitt Management
as 2:2024cv00452
Defendant:
Abbitt Management
Plaintiff:
Donnitta Worsham and William N. Worsham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ellis v. Uhaul Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Defendant:
Labor Ready LLC and Uhaul Inc
Plaintiff:
Alonza Anthony Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jackson v. School Board City of Richmond et al
as 3:2024cv00528
Defendant:
Kevin Olds, Jason Kamras, c/o Dawn Page School Board City of Richmond and others
Plaintiff:
Tameeka Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00529
Defendant:
Robert Gilstrap, Kevin Olds, Tameeka Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Anderson v. Honey
as 3:2024cv00524
Defendant:
Judge John K. Honey
Plaintiff:
Steve Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
