Eighth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Abraham v. Collins
as 4:2026cv01287
Plaintiff:
Timon Abraham
Defendant:
Douglas A. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Greene v. 430 South Los Angeles Street LLC
as 3:2026cv00234
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
430 South Los Angeles Street LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Moody v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 4:2026cv01285
Plaintiff:
Martez Moody
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Yrkoski v. McLean County et al
as 1:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Jacinta Yrkoski
Defendant:
McLean County, Dakota Central Human Service Zone and North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hinton v. Hennepin County Sheriff's Department et al
as 0:2026cv03586
Plaintiff:
Keevin Lashawn Hinton
Defendant:
Hennepin County Sheriff's Department, Jason Wong, Michael Kipka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Henry v. Cobalt Credit Union
as 4:2026cv00677
Plaintiff:
Cecil Henry
Defendant:
Cobalt Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
