New York Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 89,555
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. State of New York et al
as 5:2024cv01481
Plaintiff:
Kyle Davis
Defendant:
Trooper John Doe #2, Investigator John Doe #1, Investigator Bradley Holcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Seneca County et al
as 5:2024cv01482
Defendant:
Public Defender John Carey, Seneca County Public Defender's Office, Deputy Daniel Jacobsen and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Aaron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Seneca County et al
as 5:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Kyle A. Davis
Defendant:
Daniel Jacobson, Michael Strohm, Seneca County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv09315
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
